Monday, December 26, 2016

2017 and Beyond


Looking back since my surgery in late 2013, things have been on a continual climb and I couldn't be happier.  2016 will close out as a year with many firsts and PR(s) for myself.  I qualified and will run Boston (3:05:24) in April, finished my first 50 miler with a third place finish, qualified for Western States with my finish at the Pinhoti 100 miler and was the second year I logged nearly 2400 annual miles.  With a little over a year of running before I turn 40, I have found that new problems have replaced the old, with sore and tight legs replacing the old fatigued set I had.  I am not sure how long I will continue to set new PR(s) or add longer distances; however, I do know that this procedure allowed all of these past successes and future opportunities to be possible.

Best Wishes and Happy Running to All.



Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Looking Ahead (March 2015)

I just ran another PR (3:28:00), shaving off almost 20 minutes from last year's course time.  I would say that there is nothing but PRs (current 5K 19:48, 10K 40:56, 15K 1:08:04, Half 1:38:36, and Full 3:28:00) ahead for some time and that this procedure has given me the ability to train and run without pain and suffering.  I could not have imagined that my pain wasn't from running, but instead from diseased veins.  If nothing else might help a person make this decision, my personal, albeit anecdotal, success should be more than enough to help persuade any individual into having this procedure performed.

Friday, March 28, 2014

Finally back in the saddle! (March 2014)

As of March 2014 it has been nearly 4 months since the removal of my Great and Lesser Saphenous veins in both of my legs via Radiofrequency ablation (VNUS system).  During my first marathon in Columbia S.C. this month I made excellent time up until mile 18-19, similar to Huntsville; however, like at Huntsville my cramping returned.  The difference this time was that I was properly hydrated and was using the Hammer supplemental salt capsules.  Another and more troubling difference was that the cramps again started in my inner thigh, but this time radiated throughout my legs and calves until I was almost immobile.  I completed the race, but my time was my second worst ever.  After trying to figure out what might be the problem and if I might be through with marathons I did some research and figured out that I just wasn't putting in the miles and that the cramps were from fatigue, not hydration or electrolyte issues.  With this in mind I returned to the trails the day after the marathon and ran up until my next race.  At the next marathon, in Georgia, it all came together.  I ran a pace on a much harder course that tied my PR at 3:47.  It was the fastest that I had ever run that course.  I also set a new PR for my 15k at another race along the way.  What's even better than my times is that recovery is almost instant.  I have very little soreness or fatigue just 48 hours after a marathon which allows me to return to running quicker.  Also, after this last marathon, not only was it at my PR, but I could also function pretty much like a normal human being after finishing.  I could eat, walk around and basically just take the rest of the day like anybody in my family that hadn't done anything physical.

I still want to push harder and try to really knock back some of my PRs a little more drastically, but being able to hit them or erase them and feel physically great afterwards is enough proof to me that the procedure was successful and worth both the time and cost.  Again; however, I would like to say that addressing venous insufficiency is more about how you feel and probably how long you live and less on the limitation of how fast you can make your body perform.   Especially if you are already using compression hoses, don't expect PRs to just erase themselves, they won't, but with enough hard work, you will be able to finish a race at or above previous levels and feel great doing it.




Saturday, December 28, 2013

1st Marathon After Surgery


Well I ran a marathon just before and just after the procedure and without a doubt it improves circulation and allows for less pain and heaviness in the legs during and after such events.  It also seems to allow for a quicker recovery time.  However, without proper training it doesn't, at least by itself, make you faster.  In addition; if you, like myself, battle cramps, don't expect them to resolve mysteriously either.  I didn't run for about a month between the surgeries and this last marathon, and although my half split was 1:47ish the cramps started after mile 18 and pretty much tanked me after 20.  I came in at 4:05, about 20 minutes off where I should have been.  I had hoped that the improved circulation that I feel/felt certain exists would decrease or resolve the cramps I battle so I didn't use the Hammer salt capsules I have come to rely upon.  The cramps only relocated from my calves and quads to my inner thigh and hamstring area on a course that was the flattest I had ever ran.  Long story short; if you have venous insufficiency, removal of the GSV will make you feel a lot better and allow you to push yourself harder thereby potentially making you faster, but don't think that it alone will do anything for your PR.  I plan to work pretty hard running up to my next marathon and will post if the combination of the GSV removal and proper training allows for a new PR or just for a more pleasant running experience at a non-improved pace.  I will be happy either way, but hope for a PR in the next 12 months, if not first quarter of 2014.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Prologue


I am a runner who is currently being treated for venous insufficiency through the removal of my Great and Lesser Saphenous veins in both of my legs. 

I have decided to blog about my experience because I cannot find much, if any information about how runners or any other sport enthusiast do after such procedures.  I have looked on message boards and through Medline in an attempt to better inform myself as to what I should expect, but have only seen a few random post claiming improvement in times of about 5%.  However, these claims seem to be founded on one study that focused on venous return due to compression hose use, not invasive treatment options such as ablation, stripping, or sclerotherapy.  In addition I have an opportunity to share my experience, almost as a science project as I am having my ablation in between two equal caliber marathons with an obvious lack of training for the second as the only unequal variable.





Background: (2010-2012)


I am an almost 36 y.o. male who has been running steadily for about 7 years, but who has been more or less dedicated for 2-3 years.  I have been tracking my running through NikePlus and now Garmin for the last 3 years.  In the last 12-18 months, I have attempted to average 30+ miles per week and improving times on all of my distances.  Currently I have ran 5 marathons, 15 halfs and countless 10/5Ks along with my weekly runs.  PRs are 3:47(26.2), 1:46(13.1), 1:11(9.3), 43:30(6.2) and 20flat(3.1); most of which have come in the past 12 months.  I am a pharmacist and work 10 hour days, 4 days a week; the pertinence of which will become clear as the discussion evolves.

Over the past several years I had developed small spider veins in my abdomen.  The veins were an aesthetic problem at best and apparently weren't even visible to anybody but myself.  Nonetheless, I sought treatment, first with a plastic surgeon, who promptly sent me away.  The reason I was given for this reaction, is that my varicosities were in a very unusual location and he was concerned that my symptoms might be related to a hepatic portal vein issue.  He also said that if I could get a hepatic specialist to sign off on that issue he would look further at possible treatment with sclerotherapy.  I told him thanks and then promptly saw the vascular surgeon instead, whom I currently still use.  Upon meeting the vascular surgeon he examined me and I told him about the previous encounter with the plastic surgeon.  At this point his demeanor changed and he had me lay down.  He did a physical examination and said that possibly my liver was larger than average then promptly sent me to a gastroenterologist.  I went through the entire previous two conversations with the gastroenterologist and he also gave me a physical exam.  Upon completion, he recommend a CT scan with contrast.  The scan came out fine and he then sent me back to the vascular surgeon.  At this point the vascular surgeon recommended Veinwave treatment because the veins were so small.  Now a few points about this methodology; first it is painful, second it is expensive, and third it just doesn't work all that well.  I think that I am not alone in my opinion about this procedure because the vascular lab I use discontinued this methodology within a year.  However, I did go through two round of this and endured over 300 painful sticks and spent over $1000.  About a  year went by and I really liked the vascular surgeon, but didn't like this technique, so I decided to show my varicosities to my dermatologist, thinking that a simple laser treatment would be a better option for these seemingly minor and almost topical veins.  He agreed and I set up an appointment with the technician.  This methodology is great for spider veins.  It is still painful, maybe slightly less so than Veinwave and cost about the same, but the results are far and away better.

Now here is where this discussion becomes interesting to anyone who might unknowingly have venous insufficiency/reflux, especially runners or anybody else who keeps up a decent amount of physical activities, i.e. cyclist.
In late November of 2012 I went to my scheduled appointment with the laser technician.  The appointment went well and the results with the spider veins almost seemed instant.  However, and just as an aside on my way out, the technician said that I had something on the back of one of my legs that I should have checked out with a vascular surgeon.  I didn't really pay much thought to it, but after several more months and the appearance of a large bulging vein on the inside of my right knee I made an appointment to see my vascular surgeon, once again.   
Current ordeal (First Half 2013)
In early 2013 I entered the vascular lab, once again, but this time with something that really seemed to warrant a vascular surgeon.  I had a large branch off the GSV that had started to varicose and I started having pain and burning in the area after standing or sitting for extended periods of time.  At this point I was scheduled for an ultrasound on both legs.  After getting the results I met, once again, with the vascular surgeon who told me that all my valves were basically nonfunctional in both the GSV and LSV of my right leg.  He then asked me about my left leg and I told him that my left leg was my good leg.  He then told me it was my worse diseased leg. 
Now as an aside I have had leg cramps since I guess birth and I don't know if this has anything to do with what I am dealing with now, but as long as I can remember I have been woken up in the middle of the night with terrible leg cramps for which extremely hot baths and ibuprofen have been my treatment.  My only reason for mentioning this, is that I assume I am not alone here either and I don't know if my problem is a purely genetic one that would have occurred regardless or if I have caused or at least worsened it with such behavior over the past 30+ years.  The vascular guy tends to blame my condition on poor genetics and career choice, but I don't think I helped myself with scalding hot baths and excessive use of ibuprofen.
Radiofrequency ablation (VNUS system) was recommend with concomitant use of 20-30mm thigh high compression hoses to be worn while working.  I was already using knee high compression hoses for marathons.  I agreed with his recommendations as this condition will do nothing but worsen and only cause further issues and treatment more complicated as time passes.
Current ordeal (Insurance)
My insurance required me to wear my compression hoses for 3 months before I could even request ablation treatment.  The hoses cost $95 per pair with insurance and I purchased two pair.  I have access to wholesale cost of these and they are just high, I wasn't simply getting ripped off.  Also, at this point I can tell you that you will get 5-6 months out of a pair and that is all that can be expected.  I had an additional ultrasound after the three month period and then the doctor submitted my prior authorization to the insurance for which I was promptly denied.  My valves were shot, but the veins themselves were about 0.5mm too small.  I asked the doctor about this, but he said not to worry and appeared to have expected for this kind of rigmarole.  I did ask him if after the next ultrasound if I were denied again could I just pay for the procedure; he told me sure, but that they charged $8000 per leg for cash paying customers.  I have yet to see what the contracted price with my insurance company is, but expect it to be 25-50% of that.  After my third and final ultrasound I was approved with valve failure >10 times the norm and vein circumference twice of what they required.  The difference was I didn't wear my stockings the day of the final ultrasound which shows that they help possibly stop progression, but don't reverse or resolve the condition. 
Right leg ablation (11/7/13)
I had my first leg treated on Thursday, the treatment lasted about an hour and I would say that there is basically no pain associated with it, or at least I didn't have any pain during the procedure.  They gave me a 0.1mg clonidine and 1mg lorazepam about 30 minutes prior to procedure, but no oral pain medications either before, during, or after. 



They do recommend the use of over the counter NSAIDs if need be while you heal, but I haven't had any pain and today is Sunday.  There are two stitches in my leg and the leg was placed in a compression hose and remained that way for 72 hours.  I have now removed the hose and the leg looks fine.  There is a small amount of bruising and a lot of dried betadine and marks from their paint pens, markers, .... etc.  I did work yesterday, just 48 hours after the procedure, but that isn't recommended.  I will go for an ultrasound on Monday morning, then I am scheduled to have my left leg operated on this coming Thursday.  I am running the Rocket City Marathon on 12/14/13.  I will update the blog after each step along the way and hope for an improved life/running experience.  I hope this information helps somebody out there and look forward to any comments and/or questions.